1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 962 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac DeVille | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | DeVille | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3724 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 273 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1940 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 76 L |
