1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2010 Ford F-250
To start off, 2010 Ford F-250 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-250 (300 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-250 weights approximately 663 kg more than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac DeVille | 2010 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | DeVille | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 300 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 2805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 6253 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 2029 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 115 L |
