1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2010 Subaru Tribeca
To start off, 2010 Subaru Tribeca is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Subaru Tribeca (256 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Subaru Tribeca should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 273 kg more than 2010 Subaru Tribeca.
Because 2010 Subaru Tribeca is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Subaru Tribeca will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac DeVille | 2010 Subaru Tribeca | |
| Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
| Model | DeVille | Tribeca |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 256 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1869 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4864 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1877 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 64 L |
