1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2011 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2011 Smart ForTwo is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 138 more horse power than 2011 Smart ForTwo. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2011 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1302 kg more than 2011 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac DeVille | 2011 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Cadillac | Smart |
Model | DeVille | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 33 L |