1962 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2000 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2000 Subaru Outback is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Subaru Outback (206 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac Eldorado. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 520 kg more than 2000 Subaru Outback.
Because 2000 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Eldorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Eldorado (582 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Subaru Outback. (282 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1962 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Eldorado | 2000 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
Model | Eldorado | Outback |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 206 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 282 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 89.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2130 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5660 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 64 L |