1962 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2004 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer (239 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac Eldorado. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 210 kg more than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Eldorado (582 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. (382 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Eldorado | 2004 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
Model | Eldorado | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 4604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 239 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2130 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5660 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 85 L |