1962 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac Eldorado (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2010 Audi TT. (168 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi TT.
Because 2010 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Eldorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Eldorado (582 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Audi TT. (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1962 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Eldorado | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Cadillac | Audi |
Model | Eldorado | TT |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5660 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |