1962 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac Eldorado (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2010 Nissan X-Trail. (137 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Eldorado (582 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 384 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan X-Trail. (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1962 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Eldorado | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | Eldorado | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5660 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 65 L |