1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1952 Talbot Baby
To start off, 1962 Cadillac Sixty is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 485 kg more than 1952 Talbot Baby.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 1952 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Cadillac | Talbot |
Model | Sixty | Baby |
Year Released | 1962 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3130 mm |