1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1953 Fiat 1900
To start off, 1962 Cadillac Sixty is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Fiat 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Fiat 1900 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 905 kg more than 1953 Fiat 1900.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac Sixty | 1953 Fiat 1900 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | Sixty | 1900 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 79 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1230 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2660 mm |
