1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1960 Wartburg 311
To start off, 1962 Cadillac Sixty is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Wartburg 311. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Wartburg 311 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1175 kg more than 1960 Wartburg 311.
Because 1962 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Wartburg 311, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 500 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Wartburg 311. (82 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Wartburg 311.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 1960 Wartburg 311 | |
Make | Cadillac | Wartburg |
Model | Sixty | 311 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 36 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 82 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 78 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 40 L |