1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1963 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 1963 Jaguar MK X is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 245 kg more than 1963 Jaguar MK X.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Jaguar MK X. (360 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Jaguar MK X.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 1963 Jaguar MK X | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | Sixty | MK X |
Year Released | 1962 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3780 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 252 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 360 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 106 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 63 L |