1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1963 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1963 Jeep CJ5 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1103 kg more than 1963 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1963 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 437 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac Sixty | 1963 Jeep CJ5 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
| Model | Sixty | CJ5 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1032 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2060 mm |
