1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1964 DKW F 11
To start off, 1964 DKW F 11 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1405 kg more than 1964 DKW F 11.
Because 1962 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 510 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 DKW F 11. (72 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 DKW F 11.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 1964 DKW F 11 | |
Make | Cadillac | DKW |
Model | Sixty | F 11 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 72 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 68 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 31 L |