1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1966 Fiat Campagnola
To start off, 1966 Fiat Campagnola is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 845 kg more than 1966 Fiat Campagnola.
Because 1966 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 454 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Fiat Campagnola. (128 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Fiat Campagnola.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac Sixty | 1966 Fiat Campagnola | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | Sixty | Campagnola |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 62 HP |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 128 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 90 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 38 L |
