1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1974 Lancia Fulvia
To start off, 1974 Lancia Fulvia is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1135 kg more than 1974 Lancia Fulvia.
Because 1962 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Lancia Fulvia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 429 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Lancia Fulvia. (153 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Lancia Fulvia.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 1974 Lancia Fulvia | |
Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
Model | Sixty | Fulvia |
Year Released | 1962 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 153 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 38 L |