1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1979 Volvo 66
To start off, 1979 Volvo 66 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1315 kg more than 1979 Volvo 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac Sixty | 1979 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | Sixty | 66 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 47 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
