1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1980 Audi 4000
To start off, 1980 Audi 4000 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1980 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac Sixty | 1980 Audi 4000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Audi |
| Model | Sixty | 4000 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2550 mm |
