1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1105 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 437 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. (145 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | Sixty | Sigma |
Year Released | 1962 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 86 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 145 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2520 mm |