1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1982 Mercury Grand Marquis
To start off, 1982 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 455 kg more than 1982 Mercury Grand Marquis.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 320 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mercury Grand Marquis. (262 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mercury Grand Marquis.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 1982 Mercury Grand Marquis | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
Model | Sixty | Grand Marquis |
Year Released | 1962 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 4186 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 262 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2910 mm |