1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1988 Ferrari F40
To start off, 1988 Ferrari F40 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1035 kg more than 1988 Ferrari F40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Ferrari F40 (720 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. (582 Nm). This means 1988 Ferrari F40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Cadillac Sixty.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 1988 Ferrari F40 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ferrari |
Model | Sixty | F40 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 622 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 720 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1130 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 120 L |