1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1990 Cadillac Aurora
To start off, 1990 Cadillac Aurora is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 547 kg more than 1990 Cadillac Aurora.
Because 1990 Cadillac Aurora is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Cadillac Aurora will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Cadillac Aurora. (366 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Cadillac Aurora.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac Sixty | 1990 Cadillac Aurora | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | Sixty | Aurora |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 4465 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 84 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1588 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2860 mm |
