1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1994 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 1994 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac Sixty | 1994 Mercedes-Benz E | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Sixty | E |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 4973 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
