1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1998 Dodge Ram
To start off, 1998 Dodge Ram is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 65 kg more than 1998 Dodge Ram.
Because 1998 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Dodge Ram. (305 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac Sixty | 1998 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
| Model | Sixty | Ram |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3906 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 173 HP |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 2070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2790 mm |
