1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1998 Honda Integra
To start off, 1998 Honda Integra is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 936 kg more than 1998 Honda Integra.
Because 1962 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 1998 Honda Integra | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | Sixty | Integra |
Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1199 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2570 mm |