1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 487 kg more than 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Because 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (305 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | Sixty | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3963 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 305 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 98.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 86.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1648 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 87 L |