1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 305 kg more than 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac Sixty | 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Sixty | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2730 mm |
