1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1998 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 1998 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 705 kg more than 1998 Mitsubishi Magna.
Because 1962 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mitsubishi Magna. (300 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mitsubishi Magna.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac Sixty | 1998 Mitsubishi Magna | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Sixty | Magna |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2730 mm |
