1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1999 Alfa Romeo 156
To start off, 1999 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 815 kg more than 1999 Alfa Romeo 156.
Because 1962 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 360 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Alfa Romeo 156. (222 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Alfa Romeo 156.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 1999 Alfa Romeo 156 | |
Make | Cadillac | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Sixty | 156 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 222 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 63 L |