1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1999 Renault Scenic
To start off, 1999 Renault Scenic is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 650 kg more than 1999 Renault Scenic.
Because 1999 Renault Scenic is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Scenic will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Scenic. (260 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 1999 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | Sixty | Scenic |
Year Released | 1962 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 260 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |