1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2000 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 443 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | Sixty | Tracker |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 97 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 139 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2210 mm |