1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2000 Nissan Terrano II
To start off, 2000 Nissan Terrano II is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 510 kg more than 2000 Nissan Terrano II.
Because 2000 Nissan Terrano II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Terrano II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 385 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Nissan Terrano II. (197 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Nissan Terrano II.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 2000 Nissan Terrano II | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | Sixty | Terrano II |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 116 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 197 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2660 mm |