1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2001 Daewoo Kalos
To start off, 2001 Daewoo Kalos is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1058 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Kalos.
Because 1962 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Kalos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 437 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Kalos. (145 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Kalos.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 2001 Daewoo Kalos | |
Make | Cadillac | Daewoo |
Model | Sixty | Kalos |
Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1077 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 48 L |