1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2001 Mercedes-Benz A
To start off, 2001 Mercedes-Benz A is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 85 kg more than 2001 Mercedes-Benz A.
Because 1962 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mercedes-Benz A, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 402 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mercedes-Benz A. (180 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mercedes-Benz A.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac Sixty | 2001 Mercedes-Benz A | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Sixty | A |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1898 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 91 HP |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 2050 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 80 L |
