1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2003 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2003 Ford Explorer is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 185 kg more than 2003 Ford Explorer.
Because 2003 Ford Explorer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Explorer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Explorer. (305 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Explorer.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 2003 Ford Explorer | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Sixty | Explorer |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 305 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2840 mm |