1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2003 Holden Frontera
To start off, 2003 Holden Frontera is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 435 kg more than 2003 Holden Frontera.
Because 2003 Holden Frontera is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Holden Frontera will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Holden Frontera. (290 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Holden Frontera.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 2003 Holden Frontera | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | Sixty | Frontera |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 203 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2710 mm |