1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2004 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2004 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln Navigator weights approximately 584 kg more than 1962 Cadillac Sixty.
Because 2004 Lincoln Navigator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln Navigator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Lincoln Navigator. (481 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Lincoln Navigator.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac Sixty | 2004 Lincoln Navigator | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lincoln |
| Model | Sixty | Navigator |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 5408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 301 HP |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 481 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 106 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 2719 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5240 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3070 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 106 L |
