1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2004 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2004 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 434 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac Sixty | 2004 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Proton |
| Model | Sixty | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 109 HP |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2610 mm |
