1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 131 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. (373 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | Sixty | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 4161 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 275 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 373 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 102 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 2004 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 83 L |