1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2005 MCC Smart
To start off, 2005 MCC Smart is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1405 kg more than 2005 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 486 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Smart. (96 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac Sixty | 2005 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Cadillac | MCC |
| Model | Sixty | Smart |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3440 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2370 mm |
