1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz R
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz R weights approximately 135 kg more than 1962 Cadillac Sixty.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz R is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercedes-Benz R. (511 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercedes-Benz R.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 2005 Mercedes-Benz R | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Sixty | R |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 221 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 511 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 92 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 2270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3220 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 80 L |