1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2006 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2006 Dodge Durango is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Durango weights approximately 208 kg more than 1962 Cadillac Sixty.
Because 2006 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Dodge Durango. (319 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Dodge Durango.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 2006 Dodge Durango | |
Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
Model | Sixty | Durango |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3704 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 319 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 2343 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 102 L |