1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2006 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 131 kg more than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 375 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (207 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac Sixty | 2006 Isuzu KB | |
| Make | Cadillac | Isuzu |
| Model | Sixty | KB |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2405 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 127 HP |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 100 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 2004 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 76 L |
