1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT
To start off, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT weights approximately 301 kg more than 1962 Cadillac Sixty.
Because 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Lincoln Mark LT. (495 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Lincoln Mark LT.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 2006 Lincoln Mark LT | |
Make | Cadillac | Lincoln |
Model | Sixty | Mark LT |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 5406 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 495 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 105.9 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 2436 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 114 L |