1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz S
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz S is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 185 kg more than 2006 Mercedes-Benz S.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz S (700 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. (582 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz S will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Cadillac Sixty.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 2006 Mercedes-Benz S | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Sixty | S |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 5441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 493 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 700 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5170 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3090 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 88 L |