1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 665 kg more than 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer. (355 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac Sixty | 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Sixty | Lancer |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 262 HP |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 355 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 74 L |
