1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2008 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2008 Subaru Outback is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 705 kg more than 2008 Subaru Outback.
Because 2008 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 355 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Subaru Outback. (227 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 2008 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
Model | Sixty | Outback |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 227 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 99.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 64 L |