1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2009 Cadillac BLS

To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 535 kg more than 2009 Cadillac BLS.

Because 1962 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (400 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac BLS.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Cadillac Sixty 2009 Cadillac BLS
Make Cadillac Cadillac
Model Sixty BLS
Year Released 1962 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6388 cc 1910 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 179 HP
Torque 582 Nm 400 Nm
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 82 mm
Engine Stroke Size 98.4 mm 90.4 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2135 kg 1600 kg
Vehicle Length 5650 mm 4720 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1550 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2680 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 58 L