1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2010 Volvo S60
To start off, 2010 Volvo S60 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 366 kg more than 2010 Volvo S60.
Because 2010 Volvo S60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Volvo S60. (440 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Volvo S60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac Sixty | 2010 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | Sixty | S60 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 440 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1769 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4623 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2776 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 67 L |
