1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2011 Audi Q7
To start off, 2011 Audi Q7 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Audi Q7 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1962 Cadillac Sixty.
Because 2011 Audi Q7 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Audi Q7. (400 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Audi Q7.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 2011 Audi Q7 | |
Make | Cadillac | Audi |
Model | Sixty | Q7 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 272 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 400 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 2355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5088 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1737 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3002 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 100 L |